Mangione’s “credentials” (which by American standards are pretty ordinary.) didn’t get him the accolades he felt he deserved. It didn’t set him apart. He was also high. Then the dopamine wore off…. It’s that simple.
What if every ideology necessarily involves false assumptions? There has never been an ideology that succeeded in implementing its vision, because ultimately it is a fantastical relationship to the real totality of our existence. The proliferation of diverse ideologies speaks to the impossibility of representing that totality in narrative form, and thus it is not a question of whether an ideology is true or not, but whether in any particular situation that is the fantastical relationship which best suits it. Ted K is the ideology of the moment because it expresses our nihilistic dissatisfaction with the state of affairs. Nietzsche struggled against nihilism with his ideal of superior types, it was never political. Whereas Ted K’s anarco-primitivism is ultimately an expression of morality which N would have critiqued as the root of its nihilism. The question though is to what degree the Nietzschean anti moral fantasy is appropriate. Maybe we need morality on some fundamental level, it is essential ideology. It really is intolerable how the health care system operates.
Maybe it’s even simpler than how the health system operates (does anybody really both sides of this issue?). OR: imagine being a person inside the industry facing an ocean of fentanyl users, fatness and the thousands of problems that causes..I could go on for a long time….the healthcare problem is largely and mostly, the people. Good info has been out there forever. I don’t buy this stuff anymore…
Mangione’s “credentials” (which by American standards are pretty ordinary.) didn’t get him the accolades he felt he deserved. It didn’t set him apart. He was also high. Then the dopamine wore off…. It’s that simple.
What if every ideology necessarily involves false assumptions? There has never been an ideology that succeeded in implementing its vision, because ultimately it is a fantastical relationship to the real totality of our existence. The proliferation of diverse ideologies speaks to the impossibility of representing that totality in narrative form, and thus it is not a question of whether an ideology is true or not, but whether in any particular situation that is the fantastical relationship which best suits it. Ted K is the ideology of the moment because it expresses our nihilistic dissatisfaction with the state of affairs. Nietzsche struggled against nihilism with his ideal of superior types, it was never political. Whereas Ted K’s anarco-primitivism is ultimately an expression of morality which N would have critiqued as the root of its nihilism. The question though is to what degree the Nietzschean anti moral fantasy is appropriate. Maybe we need morality on some fundamental level, it is essential ideology. It really is intolerable how the health care system operates.
Maybe it’s even simpler than how the health system operates (does anybody really both sides of this issue?). OR: imagine being a person inside the industry facing an ocean of fentanyl users, fatness and the thousands of problems that causes..I could go on for a long time….the healthcare problem is largely and mostly, the people. Good info has been out there forever. I don’t buy this stuff anymore…
not 'anti' but ante-, post and extramoral
check out essentialsalts .. start at the end ... hahah!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1LLJEBBX1o
to Keegan Kjeldsen [Txn doommetalist gone proseauder]:
Philosophers of the Future - Nietzsche Podcast Season Three Finale --- essentialsalts --- 58.8K subscribers ---- 11K views 1 year ago
wrote him this this morn:
have i offered you this 'searchpoolslop' yet?
https://archive.org/details/A-Quest-for-Ethics.pdf == 22289 K -- upload: 4/3/21
80s to 2016 ---- 1959 margin to margin A4 pages
I am a fan of Keegan’s podcast. I don’t necessarily see Nietzsche the exact same way but I agree with him on a lot of things.